首页> 外文OA文献 >Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review
【2h】

Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review

机译:使用非劣效性测试评估远程医疗和电子医疗服务:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: An increasing number of studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health are designed as noninferiority studies, aiming to show that the telemedicine/e-health solution is not inferior to the traditional way of treating patients. Objective: The objective is to review and sum up the status of noninferiority studies within this field, describing advantages and pitfalls of this approach. Methods: PubMed was searched according to defined criteria, and 16 relevant articles were identified from the period 2008-June 2011. Results: Most of the studies were related to the fields of psychiatry and emergency medicine, and most were published in journals relating to these fields or in general scientific or general medicine journals. All the studies claimed to be noninferiority studies, but 7 out of 16 tested for statistical differences as a proxy of noninferiority. Conclusions: The methodological quality of the studies varied. We discuss optimal procedures for future noninferiority studies within the field of telemedicine and e-health and situations in which this approach is most appropriate.
机译:背景:远程医疗和电子医疗领域中越来越多的研究被设计为非劣效性研究,目的是表明远程医疗/电子医疗解决方案并不逊色于传统的患者治疗方法。目的:目的是回顾和总结该领域中非劣效性研究的现状,描述这种方法的优势和陷阱。方法:根据确定的标准检索PubMed,从2008年6月至2011年6月确定16篇相关文章。结果:大多数研究与精神病学和急诊医学领域相关,并且大多数发表在与这些问题相关的期刊上领域或普通科学或普通医学期刊。所有的研究都声称是非劣效性研究,但16项研究中有7项作为非劣效性的代表进行了统计差异测试。结论:研究的方法学质量参差不齐。我们讨论了在远程医疗和电子医疗领域以及这种方法最适合的情况下进行未来非劣效性研究的最佳程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号